"Pick and choose, pick and choose, people!", screamed jester with HTC sense and Samsung Galaxy S II juggling in front with the crowd to buy the hottest smartphone of the season.
If there was ever a tough call between two top-shelf, Android phones, it should be. Even a glimpse through the spec sheet, I can't tell you a both problem is powered by a 1.2 GHz dual core chip sets, allows them to record Full HD 1080p video at 30 fps with 8MP camera, 4.3 "shows and both are running latest Android Melopswmo 2.3 with homebrew interface overlays – concept and TouchWiz.
And yet, when you dig deeper, HTC sense and Samsung Galaxy S II is somewhat different design philosophy-polarizing screen technology, and the draft resolution do not match, the dual-core processors chipsets are not from the same parent and the concepts of user interface has two conflicting things. What is right for you? Read while we jump in to solve this dilemma.
Design:
Despite the fact that delicate and heavier to the Samsung Galaxy s II, HTC sense of really feel more nicely in your hand. Both phones have almost the same width and length, but the Galaxy S II comes a little edgy, rectangular plate is anorexic, although adding thickness and be in heft HTC sensation to feel more stable, and that the curved corners with tapered edges descending dimension be palm-friendly. This feeling, then reinforced by the choice of material for the aluminium chassis-and soft-touch plastic is more comfortable for handling and show off by black plastic.
But these are deliberate design approaches-the first since the Samsung Galaxy S, prefer hit where it should be on marketing materials, and will become Galaxy S II thinnest and lightest handset with a 4.3 display, hence the design of all-plastic. HTC prefers more sophisticated materials design and still currently is seeking to achieve a fairly consistent look throughout your portfolio, the Android, which makes the phones of this signal is directly recognizable, regardless of their niche market is heading for even more commonly because of similar shows.
So which one should you choose depending on the design and just looks completely subjective-personally, I prefer phones with a large screen is as thin and light as possible, but many others will go to the design template and more sophisticated and distinctive character of HTC. If you pay a lot of money for a phone, you might get some as well as aluminium around it, right?In addition, the various video technology allowed the Samsung Galaxy S to reduce screen delicate II-Super AMOLED plus takes less than Super-LCD with HTC sense. It has other merits, also, like the almost infinite contrast, wide viewing angles and saturated, vivid colors. The screen on the HTC sense is able to demonstrate the lively colors, but with a more limited scope, and when you're half tilting the phone to determine the angles of view, the colors and brightness are starting to fade considerably.
The LCD screen on the HTC sense appears slightly lighter indoors, but outdoors in direct sunlight for low reflectance s Galaxy II coating makes the image a bit easier to see. There is one area where HTC sense is in front, but the resolution 960 x 540 qHD, compared with 480 x 800 pixels in 4.3 in II Galaxy S-incher. By Super AMOLED plus technology removes the PenTile matrix pixel RGBG settlement, individual pixels are different, as the Galaxy S, for example, when you bring your phone near your eyes.
Unlike ATRIX Motorola 4 G, however, a user with screen qHD PenTile RGBW pixel arrang felt sense of HTC a normal RGB matrix to decision qHD. Thus, taking into account the same 4.3 "screen sizes, gives motion round for HTC handsets, which has the highest density of pixels from the Samsung Galaxy S II, a bit easier on the eyes when reading small text. So, if you can read many of your smartphone, and many people are doing today, HTC sense, perhaps, a safe, but if you watch many movies, Super AMOLED Plus is best happiness colors, as well as the ability to define separate hue. The colors appear a bit colder, but, as in the first Super AMOLED screen.
We look at both sides, we find the key is located on the right energy/lock for s Galaxy II more adequately from the top of the HTC sense, as you are struggling to reach such a large handset. Often we pressure on the central aspect of s Galaxy II however, erroneously, locked the lower screen-the flight for a replacement.
The glass at the top of the screen feels like HTC is slightly curved inwards at the ends, recessing screen in shallow pit, which is supposed to be better protected when the phone is placed face-down. Bezel on the Samsung Galaxy s II also sticks over the show, however, which means it never touches on a flat surface that places either. HTC solution also see cooler by adding the total impression of the Curved shape of the phone. Capacitive buttons at the bottom of the screen is a little narrower at HTC sense and a little more difficult to reach and operate with one hand from s Galaxy II.Two phones sporting newfangled MHL port, microUSB charging combines and HDMI-out opportunities in one location, but you must use a separate cable, as both companies sold the extra equipment that mirrors the phone to screen TELEVISION HDTV. Like the MHL port at the bottom is better for the Samsung Galaxy s II, instead of the left, such as on HTC sense-this is somewhat less mixing work on your phone to stream, but more when the film, so your collection of poison.
If you want to wrap up the Department of design, we would say once again that the phones go around their home large 4.3 "screens in a different way. II Galaxy s is the thinnest and lightest phone with such a view, which in conjunction with the informal black plastic shell, makes it easier to carry around. More sophisticated shape and solid Build, with soft-touch plastic and aluminium components, HTC sense, on the other hand, more ergonomic operation and a pleasure to handle. The choice here is determined entirely from your personal preferences.
